Showing posts with label #SelfDetermination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #SelfDetermination. Show all posts

Monday, July 14, 2025

๐Ÿ—ฃ️ IMSPARK: Regionalism Recentered on Pacific Voices๐Ÿ—ฃ️

๐Ÿ—ฃ️ Imagine... Regionalism Recentered on Pacific Voices๐Ÿ—ฃ️

๐Ÿ’ก Imagined Endstate:

A future where Pacific regionalism is no longer defined by external interests or donor-driven agendas, but by the values, goals, and leadership of Pacific Island nations themselves—where decisions are shaped by Pacific priorities and delivered through Pacific-designed mechanisms.

๐Ÿ“šSource: 

Tekiteki, S. (2024). The problem with Pacific regionalism? It’s us. Development Policy Centre. Link

๐Ÿ’ฅ What’s the Big Deal:

The Pacific regionalism model is being stretched by competing external agendas and a growing disconnect between donors and Pacific Island Country (PIC) priorities๐ŸŒ. In this powerful critique, Newton Cain and Batley argue that what undermines Pacific solidarity isn't a lack of ambition or capacity in the region—but the very partners who claim to support it๐Ÿค. External actors often overshadow local voices in decision-making spaces and dilute regional cooperation with fragmented, overlapping initiatives.

This matters deeply for PI-SIDS striving for climate resilience, economic recovery, and self-determination๐ŸŒ. It’s not just about funding flows—it's about trust, respect, and re-centering the Pacific in Pacific regionalism. Real solidarity comes from enabling countries like Vanuatu, Samoa, and the Marshall Islands to lead from the front, with partners walking with them—not ahead of them๐Ÿ“ข.

#PacificRegionalism, #PILeadership, #DecolonizeDevelopment, #PacificVoices, #SelfDetermination, #ClimateJustice, #ForeignAidReform,#Inequality, #Intersectional, #RICEWEBB, #IMSPARK,


Saturday, March 8, 2025

๐ŸŒ IMSPARK: Pacific Voices Leading Pacific Research ๐ŸŒ

 ๐ŸŒ Imagine… Pacific Voices Leading Pacific Research ๐ŸŒ

๐Ÿ’ก Imagined Endstate:

A world where Pacific knowledge is valued, protected, and driven by Pacific people—ensuring that research on Pacific issues is not only about them, but by them, fostering authentic representation, cultural empowerment, and self-determined solutions to global challenges.

๐Ÿ”— Source:

Enari, D., Matapo, J., Ualesia, Y., Cammock, R., Porta, H., Boon, J., Refiti, A., & Fainga’a-Manu Sione, I. (2024). Indigenising research: Moanaroa a philosophy for practice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(11), 1044–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2024.2323565

๐Ÿ’ฅ What’s the Big Deal?

For centuries, Pacific people have been studied, analyzed, and represented by outsiders—academics and researchers who built their careers on interpreting Pacific cultures without truly understanding them. The work of figures like Margaret Mead and Derek Freeman shaped global perceptions of Pacific societies, yet these perspectives often lacked cultural depth, linguistic nuance, and the lived experiences of the people themselves.

๐Ÿ“š The Moanaroa Research Collective ๐Ÿ“š

The emergence of Pacific-led research collectives like Moanaroa is a game-changer. These groups challenge traditional academic hierarchies by ensuring that research is:

        • Led by Pacific scholars ๐ŸŽ“
        • Rooted in indigenous methodologies ๐ŸŒบ
        • Focused on uplifting and empowering Pacific communities ๐Ÿค
        • Resisting extractive research practices ๐Ÿšซ

This is not just about who tells the story—it is about who owns the narrative and shapes the knowledge systems that inform policy, education, and identity.

๐Ÿ”Ž Why Representation in Research Matters ๐Ÿ”Ž

Pacific peoples have long faced misrepresentation and underrepresentation in academic research. This has led to:

        • Flawed data driving ineffective policies ๐Ÿ›️
        • Stereotypes that distort public perception ๐ŸŽญ
        • A lack of funding for Pacific-led initiatives ๐Ÿ’ฐ
        • Decisions being made about Pacific people without their input ✍️

The COVID-19 pandemic provided a stark example of this data gap. The failure to disaggregate health statistics for Pacific communities meant that their unique vulnerabilities were often overlooked in public health strategies.

๐ŸŒŠ The Fight for Climate Justice and Self-Determination ๐ŸŒŠ

The stakes are even higher when it comes to climate change. Pacific Island nations are on the frontlines of rising sea levels and extreme weather events, yet global climate policies are often shaped by data and research that do not fully capture the lived realities of Pacific people.

To secure their place at the decision-making table, Pacific communities must:

1️⃣ Own their research and data—ensuring that policy solutions are built on knowledge that reflects their realities ๐Ÿ“Š

2️⃣ Train and support Pacific scholars—so that future generations can drive their own narratives ๐ŸŽ“

3️⃣ Build self-sustaining research institutions—reducing reliance on external funders who may have conflicting interests ๐Ÿ️

๐Ÿ” Shifting from Being Studied to Leading the Study ๐Ÿ”

The Moanaroa philosophy is a call to action: Pacific people must lead research about Pacific people. Whether it is in education, health, climate policy, or economic development, representation in research is not just about fairness—it is about survival, sovereignty, and self-determination.


#PacificResearch, #IndigenousKnowledge, #DataEquity, #SelfDetermination, #Moanaroa, #representation, #ClimateJustice,#SocialJustice,#RacialDisparities #Inclusivity, #IMSPARK 

 

⚖️IMSPARK: Mobility That Honors Climate Justice⚖️

  ⚖️Imagine… Mobility That Honors Climate Justice ⚖️ ๐Ÿ’ก Imagined Endstate: A future where those forced to move by climate change are not er...